Podcast / Video | 13.12.2020
Offene Vortragsreihe des Max-Planck-Instituts für Gesellschaftsforschung
Podcasts zur Reihe im Wintersemester 2020/2021
Helen Thompson: Brexit: Causes, Consequences, and Implications for Europe
In her lecture, Helen Thompson explains the origins of Brexit in Britain’s constitutional tradition, political economy, and geopolitical position in the post-war world. She shows how these became connected problems between 2009 and 2016 for British governments. She argues that a referendum in the medium term was largely inevitable, and that the chances it would result in a Leave vote were always quite high. She also explains why it took so long within British domestic politics to resolve whether Brexit would actually happen, and finally she considers what British secession reveals about the EU both internally and in terms of geopolitical predicaments.
Helen Thompson is Professor of Political Economy at the Department of Politics and International Studies at Cambridge University. She is a regular contributor to the podcast Talking Politics and is a columnist for the New Statesman.
Julia Lynch: Regimes of Inequality: The Political Economy of Health and Wealth
Inequality has become an intractable feature of rich industrialized democracies, despite consensus that more social and economic equality is desirable. This resilience is due to two key phenomena: legacies from the past, in particular changes in the political economy of rich democracies since the 1970s, and elite discourses around inequality. Julia Lynch examines the political dynamics underlying the “new normal” of high and rising inequality since 1980 by tracing the largely unsuccessful attempts of west European governments to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in health. In England, France, and Finland, governments stated their intention to reduce inequalities in health, yet they were largely unable or unwilling to do what it would take to achieve this goal. When center-left politicians take up the issue of socioeconomic inequalities in health, they do so in response to perceived taboos against redistribution, public spending, and market regulation. However, reframing inequality as a matter of health is at best a partial solution. Inequality persists because of the way political leaders choose to talk about it and not only because of economic necessity or demands from the electorate. Lynch discusses how these phenomena have shaped governments' efforts to control health inequalities before and during the COVID era.
Julia Lynch is Professor of Political Science at the University of Pennsylvania. Her research focuses on the politics of inequality and social policy in the rich democracies, particularly the countries of western Europe. She has a special interest in comparative health policy and the politics of aging. She currently serves as editor of the journal Socio-Economic Review and as an expert advisor on health equity to the World Health Organization's Regional Office for Europe.
Isabell Stamm: Shifting the Meaning of Firm Ownership: Recent Transformations of Ownership Succession in the German Mittelstand
If current reports and forecasts on succession in Germany are to be believed, we are experiencing a wave of succession in the German Mittelstand. This wave is characterized by a shift in both the legitimacy of the targeted subjects and the institutionalized rules of succession. Contrary to the usual stereotypes, until recently the dominant mode of transfer was internal, by family succession, whereas now the majority of company owners are considering selling to employees, external private individuals, investors, or other companies. In her presentation, Isabell Stamm focuses on the conditions of this shift in a complex blend of aging owners, progressing individualization, good economic development and low interest rates in recent years, and an expansion of the M+A market towards the SME segment. She lays out the ways in which the understanding of firm ownership and the associated rules of property transfer are shifting. In doing so, she decodes the meaning of firm ownership as an embedded and dynamic link between owning groups and firms, thereby providing a dual perspective on the social structuring and hermeneutics in the process of owning a firm.